IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L
IQCY.L (Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - IQCY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD while IWVL.L tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQCY.L returned 49.20%/yr vs 17.68%/yr for IWVL.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQCY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.
Performance
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IQCY.L is traded in GBP, while IWVL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWVL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQCY.L achieves a 31.96% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 35.68% return.
IQCY.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 31.96%
- 6M
- 31.45%
- 1Y
- 53.33%
- 3Y*
- 93.23%
- 5Y*
- 49.20%
- 10Y*
- —
IWVL.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 16.19%
- YTD
- 35.68%
- 6M
- 39.01%
- 1Y
- 69.11%
- 3Y*
- 27.36%
- 5Y*
- 17.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQCY.L Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 31.96% | 14.12% | 342.87% | 17.77% | -16.95% | 17.73% | 34.37% |
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 35.68% | 30.41% | 6.96% | 13.56% | 0.94% | 21.25% | 12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQCY.L and IWVL.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IQCY.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Technology
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Utilities
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Communication Services
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Basic Materials
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Cyclical
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Financial Services
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Healthcare
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Defensive
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Energy
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Real Estate
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IQCY.L
IWVL.L
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQCY.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.32 | 4.65 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.54 | 6.22 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.87 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 8.79 | -3.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.98 | 36.79 | -19.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQCY.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 4.65 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.23 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQCY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum IWVL.L drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQCY.L and IWVL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQCY.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -28.56% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -7.82% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -14.14% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.65% | -14.14% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -4.52% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.87% | +1.26% |
Volatility
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQCY.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 6.24% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 12.59% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 14.79% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 131.45% | 14.34% | +117.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.54% | 16.05% | +103.49% |
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQCY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQCY.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQCY.L nor IWVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IQCY.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.
IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IQCY.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.
Find the right allocation for IQCY.L and IWVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer