IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L
IQCY.L (Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - IQCY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD while XDEB.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQCY.L returned 49.20%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for XDEB.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQCY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.L.
Performance
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IQCY.L is traded in GBP, while XDEB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQCY.L achieves a 31.96% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 0.89% return.
IQCY.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 31.96%
- 6M
- 31.45%
- 1Y
- 53.33%
- 3Y*
- 93.23%
- 5Y*
- 49.20%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQCY.L Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 31.96% | 14.12% | 342.87% | 17.77% | -16.95% | 17.73% | 34.37% |
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 0.89% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQCY.L and XDEB.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IQCY.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Technology
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Utilities
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Communication Services
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Basic Materials
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Cyclical
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Financial Services
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Healthcare
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Defensive
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Energy
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Real Estate
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IQCY.L
XDEB.L
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQCY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.32 | 0.31 | +3.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.54 | 0.50 | +4.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.06 | +0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 0.38 | +5.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.98 | 1.05 | +15.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQCY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 0.31 | +3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.65 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.78 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQCY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQCY.L and XDEB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQCY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -19.61% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -6.39% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -8.47% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.65% | -10.19% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.67% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -3.50% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.31% | +0.82% |
Volatility
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that IQCY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQCY.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 2.68% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 5.97% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 7.97% | +8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 131.45% | 9.68% | +121.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.54% | 11.52% | +108.02% |
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQCY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQCY.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IQCY.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.
IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IQCY.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.
Find the right allocation for IQCY.L and XDEB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer