PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQCY.L is traded in GBP, while XDEB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQCY.L achieves a 31.96% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 0.89% return.


IQCY.L

1D
0.76%
1M
14.82%
YTD
31.96%
6M
31.45%
1Y
53.33%
3Y*
93.23%
5Y*
49.20%
10Y*

XDEB.L

1D
0.39%
1M
1.39%
YTD
0.89%
6M
0.64%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQCY.L
Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
31.96%14.12%342.87%17.77%-16.95%17.73%34.37%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
0.89%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IQCY.L and XDEB.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between IQCY.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQCY.L
XDEB.L

Industrials

46.5%
9.2%

Technology

45.0%
20.1%

Utilities

3.2%
8.1%

Communication Services

2.7%
12.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
5.6%

Financial Services

0.5%
14.0%

Healthcare

0.1%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
10.9%

Energy

0.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.7%

Industrials

IQCY.L
46.5%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Technology

IQCY.L
45.0%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Utilities

IQCY.L
3.2%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Communication Services

IQCY.L
2.7%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Basic Materials

IQCY.L
1.4%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IQCY.L
0.7%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Financial Services

IQCY.L
0.5%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Healthcare

IQCY.L
0.1%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

IQCY.L
0.0%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Energy

IQCY.L
0.0%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Real Estate

IQCY.L
0.0%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQCY.L
IQCY.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQCY.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.32

0.31

+3.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.54

0.50

+4.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.06

+0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

0.38

+5.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.98

1.05

+15.93

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQCY.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQCY.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

0.31

+3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.65

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.78

-0.38

Drawdowns

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQCY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQCY.L and XDEB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQCY.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-19.61%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-6.39%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-8.47%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

-10.19%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.67%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-3.50%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.31%

+0.82%

Volatility

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that IQCY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQCY.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

2.68%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

5.97%

+6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

7.97%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.45%

9.68%

+121.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.54%

11.52%

+108.02%

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQCY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQCY.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQCY.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IQCY.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.

IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IQCY.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQCY.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer