PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMVM vs. TMVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMVM vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMVM having a 18.13% return and TMVE slightly higher at 18.65%.


XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

TMVE

1D
0.67%
1M
0.25%
6M
12.50%
YTD
18.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$144.58K$91.35K$550.80K
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M

XMVM vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XMVM and TMVE is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMVM vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TMVE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMVM vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMVMTMVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

XMVM vs. TMVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMVM vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and TMVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMVMTMVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.83%

-8.21%

-54.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.63%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-1.35%

-8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

Volatility

XMVM vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMVMTMVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

13.19%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

13.19%

+8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

13.19%

+9.55%

XMVM vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMVM vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison

XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMVE
Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF
0.10%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMVM and TMVE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.

XMVM is categorized as Momentum, while TMVE is Mid Cap Value Equities. XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.55% for TMVE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMVM and TMVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer