XMVM vs. QQQM
XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVM returned 9.63%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
XMVM vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
XMVM
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
XMVM vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 8.00% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 19.34% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMVM and QQQM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XMVM and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMVM vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMVM
QQQM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
XMVM
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
XMVM
QQQM
Utilities
XMVM
QQQM
Industrials
XMVM
QQQM
Energy
XMVM
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
XMVM
QQQM
Real Estate
XMVM
QQQM
Technology
XMVM
QQQM
Communication Services
XMVM
QQQM
Basic Materials
XMVM
QQQM
Healthcare
XMVM
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMVM vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
XMVM
QQQM
XMVM vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMVM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.53 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 13.52 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMVM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.65 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.82 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
XMVM vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMVM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.83% | -35.04% | -27.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -11.96% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.12% | -22.70% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -35.04% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.20% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -8.25% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.11% | -0.14% |
Volatility
XMVM vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is 3.38%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that XMVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMVM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 4.48% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 12.05% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 15.91% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 22.24% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 22.12% | +0.68% |
XMVM vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMVM vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMVM and QQQM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to XMVM (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 9.63% for XMVM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
XMVM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMVM and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer