PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMVM vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMVM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 12.28%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

MMTM

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.78%
6M
1.50%
YTD
4.05%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
14.15%
ALL TIME*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$361.33K$398.75K$394.98K
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M

XMVM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.13%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
4.05%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVM and MMTM is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.57

The correlation between XMVM and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMVM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMVM
MMTM

Financial Services

37.9%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
7.6%

Energy

13.5%
4.5%

Industrials

11.7%
11.0%

Utilities

8.5%
2.0%

Technology

5.1%
42.6%

Real Estate

4.9%
1.6%

Healthcare

2.5%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

0.9%
11.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.8%

Financial Services

XMVM
37.9%
MMTM
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMVM
14.8%
MMTM
7.6%

Energy

XMVM
13.5%
MMTM
4.5%

Industrials

XMVM
11.7%
MMTM
11.0%

Utilities

XMVM
8.5%
MMTM
2.0%

Technology

XMVM
5.1%
MMTM
42.6%

Real Estate

XMVM
4.9%
MMTM
1.6%

Healthcare

XMVM
2.5%
MMTM
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

XMVM
1.2%
MMTM
2.7%

Communication Services

XMVM
0.9%
MMTM
11.4%

Basic Materials

XMVM
0.8%
MMTM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMVM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMVM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMVMMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.16

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

1.40

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

4.74

+8.98

XMVM vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVM and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMVM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMVMMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.83%

-33.85%

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-9.89%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-22.08%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-23.72%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

-33.85%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-6.09%

+5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-4.20%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.91%

-0.05%

Volatility

XMVM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is 3.30%, while State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that XMVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMVMMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

5.24%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

11.88%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

15.45%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

18.35%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

18.72%

+4.02%

XMVM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMVM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than MMTM's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.89%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMVM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMTM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 14.15% vs 12.28% for XMVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.89% for MMTM.

XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.12% for MMTM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMVM and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer