XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XMVE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - XMVE.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVE.DE returned 9.87%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMVE.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.

Performance

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVE.DE achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 18.14% return.

XMVE.DE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.04%
• 6M: 6.70%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 1Y: 18.74%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: —

AMED.DE

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -1.82%
• 6M: 15.03%
• YTD: 18.14%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 15.90%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF	10.01%	21.50%	8.85%	19.87%	-12.89%	16.87%	-3.71%	17.86%	-6.36%	1.05%
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)	18.14%	20.15%	5.95%	16.68%	-10.71%	20.90%	-1.35%	27.22%	-12.98%	-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVE.DE and AMED.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017	0.92

The correlation between XMVE.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVE.DE

XMVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 49
XMVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
XMVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XMVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XMVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XMVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

AMED.DE

AMED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AMED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
AMED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AMED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
AMED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMVE.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.85	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.73	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	2.67	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	10.34	-3.55

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVE.DE and AMED.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVE.DE and AMED.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVE.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.33%	-38.35%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-10.56%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-14.07%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	-24.06%	-1.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-2.75%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-5.58%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.73%	+0.02%

Volatility

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 3.63%. This indicates that XMVE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVE.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	3.63%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.41%	12.98%	-0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	15.28%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	15.87%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	17.34%	-1.88%

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMVE.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF	2.45%	2.62%	2.92%	2.64%	4.73%	1.87%	6.84%	0.00%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVE.DE and AMED.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, XMVE.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XMVE.DE or AMED.DE?

On fees, XMVE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVE.DE or AMED.DE?

XMVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.

What is the main difference between XMVE.DE and AMED.DE?

XMVE.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMVE.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.