XMTR vs. ADSK
XMTR (Xometry, Inc.) and ADSK (Autodesk, Inc.) are both stocks. XMTR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ADSK operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, XMTR returned 64.01%/yr vs -1.57%/yr for ADSK. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XMTR vs. ADSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMTR achieves a 54.16% return, which is significantly higher than ADSK's -34.93% return.
XMTR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 54.16%
- 6M
- 44.58%
- 1Y
- 174.24%
- 3Y*
- 64.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADSK
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- YTD
- -34.93%
- 6M
- -35.41%
- 1Y
- -36.68%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
XMTR vs. ADSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMTR Xometry, Inc. | 54.16% | 39.40% | 18.80% | 11.42% | -37.11% | -24.63% |
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | -34.93% | 0.15% | 21.39% | 30.29% | -33.54% | -5.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMTR and ADSK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.40 |
The correlation between XMTR and ADSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XMTR:
$4.76B
ADSK:
$40.83B
XMTR:
-$1.02
ADSK:
$6.84
XMTR:
6.32
ADSK:
5.49
XMTR:
16.88
ADSK:
12.80
XMTR:
$740.80M
ADSK:
$7.51B
XMTR:
$290.93M
ADSK:
$6.84B
XMTR:
-$32.96M
ADSK:
$2.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMTR vs. ADSK — Risk / Return Rank
XMTR
ADSK
XMTR vs. ADSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMTR | ADSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.81 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | -0.86 | +4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | -1.92 | +10.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMTR vs. ADSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMTR drawdown since its inception was -87.09%, which is greater than ADSK's maximum drawdown of -76.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTR and ADSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMTR | ADSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.09% | -76.92% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.93% | -42.56% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.44% | -42.56% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -43.73% | +39.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.30% | -22.64% | -34.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.56% | 19.12% | +0.44% |
Volatility
XMTR vs. ADSK - Volatility Comparison
Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) at 14.18%. This indicates that XMTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMTR | ADSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 14.18% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.81% | 28.43% | +37.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.59% | 33.97% | +58.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.23% | 35.31% | +47.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.23% | 36.44% | +46.79% |
Dividends
XMTR vs. ADSK - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMTR nor ADSK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
XMTR vs. ADSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xometry, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XMTR vs. ADSK - Profitability Comparison
XMTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.49M and revenue of 205.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.
ADSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.
XMTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.22M and revenue of 205.14M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.5%.
ADSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported an operating income of 541.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.
XMTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported a net income of -5.27M and revenue of 205.14M, resulting in a net margin of -2.6%.
ADSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMTR and ADSK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMTR has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to ADSK (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMTR dropped -87.09% vs ADSK's -76.92%.
XMTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMTR and ADSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer