ADSK vs. GD
ADSK (Autodesk, Inc.) and GD (General Dynamics Corporation) are both stocks. Over the past 10 years, ADSK returned 14.69%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for GD. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ADSK vs. GD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADSK achieves a -22.44% return, which is significantly lower than GD's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ADSK has outperformed GD with an annualized return of 14.69%, while GD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.57% annualized return.
ADSK
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- -22.44%
- 6M
- -25.27%
- 1Y
- -23.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
GD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
ADSK vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | -22.44% | 0.15% | 21.39% | 30.29% | -33.54% | -7.91% | 66.43% | 42.65% | 22.68% | 41.64% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 0.99% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADSK and GD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
ADSK:
$48.68B
GD:
$92.38B
ADSK:
$6.84
GD:
$15.92
ADSK:
33.58
GD:
21.17
ADSK:
1.29
GD:
2.68
ADSK:
6.55
GD:
1.71
ADSK:
15.26
GD:
3.54
ADSK:
$7.51B
GD:
$53.81B
ADSK:
$6.84B
GD:
$7.48B
ADSK:
$2.14B
GD:
$6.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADSK vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank
ADSK
GD
ADSK vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADSK | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | 1.17 | -1.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | 1.91 | -2.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.23 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.68 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 5.90 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADSK | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 1.17 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.70 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.57 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ADSK vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADSK drawdown since its inception was -76.92%, roughly equal to the maximum GD drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADSK and GD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADSK | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.92% | -75.67% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.15% | -14.53% | -18.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.15% | -22.55% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.99% | -22.55% | -29.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.99% | -51.63% | -0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.92% | -7.83% | -25.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.62% | -15.61% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.01% | 4.13% | +12.88% |
Volatility
ADSK vs. GD - Volatility Comparison
Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) has a higher volatility of 12.66% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 5.09%. This indicates that ADSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADSK | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.66% | 5.09% | +7.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.80% | 17.03% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 20.85% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.08% | 20.38% | +14.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.42% | 22.69% | +13.73% |
Dividends
ADSK vs. GD - Dividend Comparison
ADSK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.81% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
Financials
ADSK vs. GD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autodesk, Inc. and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADSK vs. GD - Profitability Comparison
ADSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.
GD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.
ADSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported an operating income of 541.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.
GD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
ADSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.
GD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADSK and GD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADSK has higher volatility (12.66%) compared to GD (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADSK dropped -76.92% vs GD's -75.67%.
GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADSK and GD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer