XMTM.TO vs. MTUM
XMTM.TO (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds from iShares tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMTM.TO returned 17.92%/yr vs 18.51%/yr for MTUM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMTM.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMTM.TO is traded in CAD, while MTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MTUM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMTM.TO having a 33.39% return and MTUM slightly higher at 33.43%.
XMTM.TO
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- 19.00%
- YTD
- 33.39%
- 6M
- 29.32%
- 1Y
- 40.58%
- 3Y*
- 35.55%
- 5Y*
- 17.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 18.22%
- YTD
- 33.43%
- 6M
- 31.87%
- 1Y
- 43.59%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.51%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMTM.TO iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF | 33.39% | 14.02% | 43.59% | 6.48% | -14.53% | 15.01% | 25.77% | 3.42% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 33.43% | 16.55% | 44.30% | 6.74% | -12.44% | 12.34% | 27.67% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMTM.TO and MTUM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, XMTM.TO and MTUM have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Industrials
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Financial Services
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Communication Services
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Healthcare
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Energy
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Real Estate
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Basic Materials
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Utilities
XMTM.TO
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XMTM.TO
MTUM
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMTM.TO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 4.12 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 14.20 | -4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMTM.TO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.35 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.98 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMTM.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.01%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTM.TO and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMTM.TO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.01% | -28.94% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -10.64% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -20.78% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.01% | -28.94% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -5.50% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 3.09% | +0.90% |
Volatility
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) have volatilities of 7.86% and 7.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMTM.TO | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 7.67% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 16.08% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 18.66% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 18.94% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 19.62% | +0.45% |
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMTM.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMTM.TO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
XMTM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
XMTM.TO iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF | 0.46% | 0.70% | 0.62% | 0.84% | 1.66% | 0.33% | 0.64% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMTM.TO and MTUM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for XMTM.TO.
Both ETFs track MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for XMTM.TO and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for XMTM.TO and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer