PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMTM.TO
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF
-1.05%14.02%18.50%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
2.28%18.36%13.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMTM.TO achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 2.28% return.


XMTM.TO

1D
3.68%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-6.34%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*

FEQT.NEO

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
2.28%
6M
3.52%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMTM.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMTM.TO
XMTM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMTM.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

1.23

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.73

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.65

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.49

7.22

-3.73

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMTM.TO and FEQT.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMTM.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.23

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.37

-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between XMTM.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XMTM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while FEQT.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XMTM.TO
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF
0.62%0.70%0.62%0.84%1.66%0.33%0.64%1.24%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMTM.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.01%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTM.TO and FEQT.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XMTM.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.01%

-13.24%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-11.15%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.42%

-4.10%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-1.49%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

2.54%

+1.88%

Volatility

XMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) at 5.65%. This indicates that XMTM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XMTM.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

5.65%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

9.38%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.81%

15.04%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

13.27%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

13.27%

+6.63%