XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO).

XMTM.TO and QQC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMTM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2019. QQC.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 27, 2021. Both XMTM.TO and QQC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XMTM.TO iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF	-4.57%	14.02%	43.59%	6.48%	-14.53%	14.72%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	-4.69%	15.38%	35.73%	51.73%	-28.07%	25.01%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMTM.TO having a -4.57% return and QQC.TO slightly lower at -4.69%.

XMTM.TO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: -4.57%
• 6M: -9.56%
• 1Y: 11.33%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

QQC.TO

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -3.66%
• 1Y: 19.58%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMTM.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

XMTM.TO

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF

QQC.TO

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged

Return for Risk

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMTM.TO

XMTM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XMTM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
XMTM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
XMTM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
XMTM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 57
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMTM.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	0.88	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	1.35	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.20	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	1.55	-0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	4.67	-1.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMTM.TO and QQC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMTM.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51	0.88	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.76	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between XMTM.TO and QQC.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMTM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than QQC.TO's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMTM.TO iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF	0.64%	0.70%	0.62%	0.84%	1.66%	0.33%	0.64%	1.24%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.41%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMTM.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.01%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTM.TO and QQC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMTM.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.01%	-31.81%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.39%	-13.02%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.71%	-9.37%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-8.30%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	4.31%	+0.08%

Volatility

XMTM.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) at 6.26%. This indicates that XMTM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMTM.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	6.26%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.06%	12.44%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.55%	22.28%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.54%	20.98%	-2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	20.98%	-1.13%