XMPT vs. FTMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) and FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. XMPT is passively managed, while FTMH is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMPT charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FTMH.

Performance

XMPT vs. FTMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than FTMH's 3.48% return.

XMPT

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: -1.17%
• 10Y*: 1.94%

FTMH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMPT vs. FTMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	2.34%	0.53%
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF	3.48%	0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XMPT and FTMH is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

XMPT vs. FTMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMPT

XMPT Risk / Return Rank: 47
XMPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XMPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XMPT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XMPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XMPT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMPT vs. FTMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMPT	FTMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMPT	FTMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.53	-1.11

Drawdowns

XMPT vs. FTMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than FTMH's maximum drawdown of -3.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and FTMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMPT	FTMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.24%	-3.12%	-32.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.94%	0.00%	-8.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-0.60%	-8.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XMPT	FTMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.21%	4.00%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.35%	4.00%	+5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	4.00%	+6.36%

XMPT vs. FTMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FTMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMPT vs. FTMH - Dividend Comparison

XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than FTMH's 2.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF	2.71%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	6.34%	5.87%	5.35%	3.81%	5.12%	3.74%	3.79%	4.08%	5.05%	4.84%	5.35%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMPT and FTMH in my portfolio?

XMPT and FTMH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMPT or FTMH?

On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMPT or FTMH?

FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for XMPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMPT or FTMH?

XMPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.

What is the main difference between XMPT and FTMH?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.97% for XMPT and 0.35% for FTMH.