XMMO vs. VDIGX
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and VDIGX (Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund) are both funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VDIGX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Vanguard. XMMO is passively managed, while VDIGX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.95%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for VDIGX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VDIGX.
Performance
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VDIGX with an annualized return of 19.95%, while VDIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
VDIGX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund | 2.20% | 11.11% | 20.84% | 8.11% | -4.89% | 24.86% | 12.04% | 30.94% | 0.08% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and VDIGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XMMO and VDIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
VDIGX
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
VDIGX
Technology
XMMO
VDIGX
Energy
XMMO
VDIGX
Basic Materials
XMMO
VDIGX
Healthcare
XMMO
VDIGX
Real Estate
XMMO
VDIGX
-
Utilities
XMMO
VDIGX
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
VDIGX
Financial Services
XMMO
VDIGX
Communication Services
XMMO
VDIGX
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
VDIGX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
VDIGX
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 0.84 | +3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 3.21 | +14.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than VDIGX's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VDIGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -45.23% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -9.09% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -10.23% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -16.18% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -32.98% | -3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.51% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -6.65% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.37% | -0.28% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 3.02%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 3.02% | +6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 7.84% | +8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 10.29% | +9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 13.90% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 15.71% | +6.64% |
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VDIGX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VDIGX's 24.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund | 24.03% | 21.90% | 21.94% | 2.29% | 6.06% | 5.45% | 2.83% | 4.70% | 8.72% | 5.16% | 2.86% | 5.70% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and VDIGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to VDIGX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VDIGX's -45.23%.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and VDIGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer