XMMO vs. BTGD
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds. XMMO is passively managed, while BTGD is actively managed. Over the past year, XMMO returned 31.14% vs -31.91% for BTGD. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BTGD.
Performance
XMMO vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.50%
BTGD
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -33.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 19.66% | 13.04% | -0.89% |
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -32.80% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and BTGD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
BTGD
XMMO vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.93 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | -0.60 | +4.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | -1.29 | +16.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | -0.57 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.19 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and BTGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -53.31% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -53.31% | +44.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -50.77% | +47.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -14.85% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 24.72% | -22.65% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 7.70%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 14.85% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 46.45% | -30.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 56.04% | -36.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 55.94% | -34.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 55.94% | -33.63% |
XMMO vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.00% | 3.36% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and BTGD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to XMMO (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs BTGD's -53.31%.
On 1-year performance, XMMO leads with 31.14% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 31.14% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 1.00% for BTGD.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and BTGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer