PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. BTGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

BTGD

1D
5.44%
1M
-28.40%
YTD
-32.80%
6M
-33.78%
1Y
-31.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%-0.89%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-32.80%34.62%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and BTGD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOBTGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.93

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

-0.60

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

-1.29

+16.52

XMMO vs. BTGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the BTGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and BTGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOBTGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

-0.57

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.19

+0.38

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and BTGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOBTGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-53.31%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-53.31%

+44.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-50.77%

+47.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-14.85%

+5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

24.72%

-22.65%

Volatility

XMMO vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 7.70%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOBTGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

14.85%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

46.45%

-30.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

56.04%

-36.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

55.94%

-34.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

55.94%

-33.63%

XMMO vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
5.00%3.36%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and BTGD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to XMMO (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs BTGD's -53.31%.

On 1-year performance, XMMO leads with 31.14% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 31.14% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 1.00% for BTGD.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and BTGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer