XMMO vs. ASTS
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XMMO returned 15.91%/yr vs 51.99%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XMMO vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than ASTS's 13.47% return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
ASTS
- 1D
- -15.53%
- 1M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 123.21%
- 3Y*
- 140.29%
- 5Y*
- 51.99%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 6.84% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 13.47% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and ASTS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
ASTS
XMMO vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 2.60 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 5.06 | +12.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum ASTS drawdown of -85.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -85.57% | +30.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -47.69% | +39.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -70.66% | +45.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -85.57% | +57.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -38.08% | +36.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -40.51% | +31.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 24.42% | -22.33% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 9.07%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 41.20%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 41.20% | -32.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 85.03% | -68.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 105.98% | -86.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 109.52% | -87.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 111.00% | -88.65% |
Dividends
XMMO vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and ASTS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (41.20%) compared to XMMO (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs ASTS's -85.57%.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer