PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMME.DE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMME.DE is traded in EUR, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 19.38% return.


XMME.DE

1D
3.25%
1M
1.61%
YTD
26.82%
6M
28.91%
1Y
47.79%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
0.67%
1M
1.10%
YTD
19.38%
6M
19.60%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
21.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
26.82%18.69%13.82%5.89%-15.00%4.75%6.58%21.91%-11.16%-2.35%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
19.38%6.44%33.87%50.21%-28.40%36.95%36.37%42.10%4.56%4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XMME.DE and QQQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017

0.45

The correlation between XMME.DE and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (5 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMME.DE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMME.DE
XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMME.DEQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.29

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

10.16

+4.69

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMME.DE and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMME.DEQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.95%

-46.01%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-11.01%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-27.21%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-30.99%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-2.83%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-7.79%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.56%

-0.47%

Volatility

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.71%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMME.DEQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

6.71%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

12.91%

+2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

17.05%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

22.17%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

22.67%

-3.75%

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMME.DE and QQQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMME.DE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XMME.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMME.DE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMME.DE and QQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

XMME.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer