XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE).
XMME.DE and IS3N.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMME.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Jun 21, 2017. IS3N.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both XMME.DE and IS3N.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMME.DE or IS3N.DE.
Key characteristics
| XMME.DE | IS3N.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.85% | 9.77% |
| 1Y Return | 11.95% | 12.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.42% | 1.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.63% | 4.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.96 | 1.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.35% | 12.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.96% | -35.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.72% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMME.DE having a 9.85% return and IS3N.DE slightly lower at 9.77%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XMME.DE and IS3N.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and IS3N.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMME.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.