PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLV vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLV vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 9.01% return.


XMLV

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.77%
6M
8.77%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
8.01%
ALL TIME*
9.98%

QLV

1D
0.10%
1M
1.40%
6M
6.81%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$433.57K$400.63K$648.84K
$1.62M$1.47M$1.28M

XMLV vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
11.48%5.55%17.08%1.86%-6.55%23.00%-8.42%4.97%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.01%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLV and QLV is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between XMLV and QLV has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XMLV vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMLV
QLV

Real Estate

32.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

26.0%
12.3%

Utilities

17.8%
6.4%

Industrials

10.0%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
6.4%

Energy

3.7%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
7.8%

Healthcare

2.0%
14.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.3%

Communication Services

1.0%
7.4%

Technology

1.0%
30.2%

Real Estate

XMLV
32.8%
QLV
1.4%

Financial Services

XMLV
26.0%
QLV
12.3%

Utilities

XMLV
17.8%
QLV
6.4%

Industrials

XMLV
10.0%
QLV
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XMLV
4.4%
QLV
6.4%

Energy

XMLV
3.7%
QLV
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

XMLV
2.2%
QLV
7.8%

Healthcare

XMLV
2.0%
QLV
14.1%

Basic Materials

XMLV
1.0%
QLV
1.3%

Communication Services

XMLV
1.0%
QLV
7.4%

Technology

XMLV
1.0%
QLV
30.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLV vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMLV
XMLV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMLV vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMLVQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.53

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

10.43

-3.17

XMLV vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLV and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMLV vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, which is greater than QLV's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLVQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.86%

-33.71%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-6.19%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-12.05%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-17.93%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-0.43%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-3.93%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.50%

+0.62%

Volatility

XMLV vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.64%. This indicates that XMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLVQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

2.64%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

5.96%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

7.88%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

12.63%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

16.43%

+0.54%

XMLV vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMLV vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
2.85%2.87%2.23%2.34%2.05%1.14%1.93%2.02%2.13%1.74%1.72%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLV and QLV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMLV has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to QLV (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMLV dropped -39.86% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 9.98% vs 7.14% for XMLV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XMLV.

XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

XMLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while QLV is Quality Factor. XMLV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMLV and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLV and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer