XMHQ vs. QVMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS).
XMHQ and QVMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. QVMS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. Both XMHQ and QVMS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 2.09% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 4.40% |
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 4.33% | 5.56% | 9.50% | 16.89% | -14.61% | 4.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than QVMS's 4.33% return.
XMHQ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
QVMS
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XMHQ vs. QVMS — Risk / Return Rank
XMHQ
QVMS
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMHQ | QVMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.91 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.41 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 5.63 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMHQ | QVMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.91 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMHQ and QVMS is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Dividend Comparison
XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than QVMS's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than QVMS's maximum drawdown of -28.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and QVMS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMHQ | QVMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -28.05% | -30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -14.86% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -5.27% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -9.39% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.69% | -0.25% |
Volatility
XMHQ vs. QVMS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) have volatilities of 5.99% and 6.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMHQ | QVMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.27% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 13.02% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 22.75% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 21.41% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 21.41% | -0.72% |