XMHQ vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
XMHQ and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both XMHQ and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMHQ or RFV.
Key characteristics
| XMHQ | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.35% | 1.17% |
| 1Y Return | 45.56% | 25.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.12% | 8.59% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 18.71% | 14.72% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.05% | 10.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.84 | 1.34 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.85% | 19.65% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.19% | -71.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.56% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMHQ and RFV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMHQ vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ has outperformed RFV with an annualized return of 13.05%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMHQ vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMHQ vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMHQ vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than RFV's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.59% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
XMHQ vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMHQ vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 3.81%. This indicates that XMHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.