XMHQ vs. RWK
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK).
XMHQ and RWK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both XMHQ and RWK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMHQ or RWK.
Correlation
The correlation between XMHQ and RWK is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMHQ vs. RWK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XMHQ:
1.01
RWK:
0.76
XMHQ:
1.51
RWK:
1.18
XMHQ:
1.18
RWK:
1.14
XMHQ:
1.80
RWK:
1.55
XMHQ:
4.31
RWK:
4.14
XMHQ:
4.29%
RWK:
3.12%
XMHQ:
18.34%
RWK:
16.91%
XMHQ:
-58.19%
RWK:
-56.49%
XMHQ:
-8.88%
RWK:
-8.32%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than RWK's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ has outperformed RWK with an annualized return of 11.60%, while RWK has yielded a comparatively lower 10.36% annualized return.
XMHQ
17.95%
-2.66%
0.84%
17.02%
15.48%
11.60%
RWK
11.37%
-3.17%
5.52%
11.27%
13.50%
10.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMHQ vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMHQ vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMHQ vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison
XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than RWK's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4.94% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 0.83% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.74% | 1.30% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
XMHQ vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, roughly equal to the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and RWK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMHQ vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 5.24%. This indicates that XMHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.