PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XMHQ vs. XMMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XMHQ and XMMO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

XMHQ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.35%
10.07%
XMHQ
XMMO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XMHQ:

1.21

XMMO:

2.31

Sortino Ratio

XMHQ:

1.77

XMMO:

3.16

Omega Ratio

XMHQ:

1.21

XMMO:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

XMHQ:

2.16

XMMO:

4.97

Martin Ratio

XMHQ:

4.54

XMMO:

12.46

Ulcer Index

XMHQ:

4.90%

XMMO:

3.71%

Daily Std Dev

XMHQ:

18.30%

XMMO:

20.03%

Max Drawdown

XMHQ:

-58.19%

XMMO:

-55.37%

Current Drawdown

XMHQ:

-6.25%

XMMO:

-4.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 11.99%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.


XMHQ

YTD

3.91%

1M

2.74%

6M

2.30%

1Y

19.47%

5Y*

15.73%

10Y*

11.99%

XMMO

YTD

4.99%

1M

4.16%

6M

10.79%

1Y

41.72%

5Y*

16.38%

10Y*

15.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMHQ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Expense ratio chart for XMMO: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for XMHQ: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XMHQ vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMHQ is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMMO is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMMO is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMMO is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XMHQ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XMHQ, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.212.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for XMHQ, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.773.16
The chart of Omega ratio for XMHQ, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.211.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for XMHQ, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.164.97
The chart of Martin ratio for XMHQ, currently valued at 4.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.5412.46
XMHQ
XMMO

The current XMHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMHQ and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.21
2.31
XMHQ
XMMO

Dividends

XMHQ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than XMMO's 0.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
5.00%5.20%0.73%1.72%1.00%1.12%1.22%1.59%1.06%1.64%1.34%1.25%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.32%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%1.24%

Drawdowns

XMHQ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and XMMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.25%
-4.74%
XMHQ
XMMO

Volatility

XMHQ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) have volatilities of 5.94% and 6.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.94%
6.21%
XMHQ
XMMO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab