XMHQ vs. EPU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XMHQ (Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - XMHQ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index while EPU tracks the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ returned 12.91%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for EPU. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMHQ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.

Performance

XMHQ vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of 12.91%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.73% annualized return.

XMHQ

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 7.73%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 14.55%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

EPU

• 1D: -3.70%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 18.54%
• 6M: 17.84%
• 1Y: 83.34%
• 3Y*: 46.58%
• 5Y*: 29.75%
• 10Y*: 14.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMHQ vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	7.73%	4.71%	16.79%	29.51%	-12.42%	20.98%	26.61%	27.18%	-9.08%	15.64%
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	18.54%	86.87%	21.73%	25.34%	2.05%	-11.81%	-4.31%	7.30%	-12.17%	29.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XMHQ and EPU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2009	0.47

XMHQ vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMHQ	EPU
Industrials	25.9%	2.6%
Healthcare	20.4%	0.9%
Financial Services	14.3%	27.9%
Technology	13.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	4.1%
Energy	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	54.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	3.0%
Communication Services	2.7%	1.5%
Utilities	2.2%	2.8%
Real Estate	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

XMHQ vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMHQ

XMHQ Risk / Return Rank: 29
XMHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
XMHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XMHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XMHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XMHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

EPU

EPU Risk / Return Rank: 76
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 75
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMHQ vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMHQ	EPU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.68	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	3.07	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.42	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	4.02	-2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	11.51	-6.69

XMHQ vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMHQ and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMHQ vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, roughly equal to the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and EPU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMHQ	EPU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.19%	-60.62%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-20.85%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.56%	-20.85%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-35.59%	+10.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.90%	-50.97%	+14.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-8.61%	+6.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-18.79%	+9.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	7.27%	-4.24%

Volatility

XMHQ vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) is 4.52%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that XMHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMHQ	EPU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	12.75%	-8.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	27.23%	-15.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	31.33%	-15.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	25.12%	-4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.68%	23.66%	-2.98%

XMHQ vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMHQ vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than EPU's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	2.02%	1.63%	5.78%	4.17%	5.56%	3.13%	1.91%	2.67%	1.53%	3.30%	0.85%	1.90%
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	0.59%	0.64%	5.20%	0.73%	1.72%	1.00%	1.12%	1.22%	1.59%	1.06%	1.63%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMHQ and EPU in my portfolio?

XMHQ and EPU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMHQ or EPU?

EPU has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to XMHQ (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMHQ dropped -58.19% vs EPU's -60.62%.

Which ETF is better, XMHQ or EPU?

On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 14.73% vs 12.91% for XMHQ. On fees, XMHQ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XMHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMHQ or EPU?

Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 14.73% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMHQ or EPU?

XMHQ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMHQ or EPU?

EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.59% for XMHQ.

What is the main difference between XMHQ and EPU?

XMHQ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMHQ and 0.59% for EPU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.