XME vs. XLBI
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while XLBI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. XME is passively managed, while XLBI is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XME vs. XLBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLBI's 7.80% return.
XME
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -13.85%
- 6M
- -11.18%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
XLBI
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XME vs. XLBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.21% | 38.16% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.80% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and XLBI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.64 |
XME vs. XLBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
XLBI
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XME
XLBI
-
Energy
XME
XLBI
-
Technology
XME
XLBI
-
Consumer Defensive
XME
XLBI
-
Industrials
XME
XLBI
-
Communication Services
XME
-
XLBI
-
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
XLBI
-
Financial Services
XME
-
XLBI
Healthcare
XME
-
XLBI
-
Real Estate
XME
-
XLBI
-
Utilities
XME
-
XLBI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. XLBI — Risk / Return Rank
XME
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XME vs. XLBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. XLBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than XLBI's maximum drawdown of -10.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and XLBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -10.62% | -75.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.88% | -1.88% | -20.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.00% | -2.10% | -41.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | — | — |
Volatility
XME vs. XLBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.46% | 13.93% | +22.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.70% | 13.93% | +18.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 13.93% | +18.91% |
XME vs. XLBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XME and XLBI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XME vs. XLBI - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than XLBI's 14.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.84% | 7.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and XLBI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XME and XLBI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.84%, compared with 0.36% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while XLBI is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for XME and XLBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer