PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLBI vs. DVXB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLBI vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLBI achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than DVXB's 15.12% return.


XLBI

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.73%
6M
3.94%
YTD
7.49%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.90%

DVXB

1D
-3.82%
1M
-4.08%
6M
-0.84%
YTD
15.12%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.05K$1.06K$4.38K
$131.30K$122.38K$132.20K

XLBI vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLBI and DVXB is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.96

The correlation between XLBI and DVXB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLBI vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLBI
XLBI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XLBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLBI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XLBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLBI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXB
DVXB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DVXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLBI vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLBIDVXBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.91

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

2.08

+2.57

XLBI vs. DVXB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLBI Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the DVXB Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLBI and DVXB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLBI vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLBI drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum DVXB drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBI and DVXB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLBIDVXBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-19.77%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-19.77%

+9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-12.78%

+10.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-7.54%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

8.63%

-5.77%

Volatility

XLBI vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) is 4.91%, while WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that XLBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVXB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLBIDVXBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

8.95%

-4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

22.87%

-11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

30.49%

-16.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

30.60%

-16.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

30.60%

-16.68%

XLBI vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXB's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLBI vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison

XLBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, while DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XLBI and DVXB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DVXB has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to XLBI (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLBI dropped -10.62% vs DVXB's -19.77%.

On 1-year performance, DVXB leads with 20.35% vs 14.41% for XLBI. On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLBI has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVXB has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 14.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.

XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.88%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.

XLBI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DVXB is Materials. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLBI and 0.89% for DVXB.

XLBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLBI and DVXB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer