XME vs. TAN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while TAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 18.52%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for TAN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TAN.

Performance

XME vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed TAN with an annualized return of 18.52%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.

XME

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 68.16%
• 3Y*: 32.34%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 18.52%

TAN

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -11.21%
• YTD: 19.22%
• 6M: 16.19%
• 1Y: 82.66%
• 3Y*: -4.69%
• 5Y*: -7.06%
• 10Y*: 12.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	7.18%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	21.17%
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	19.22%	48.31%	-37.61%	-26.79%	-5.24%	-25.10%	233.96%	66.53%	-25.67%	54.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and TAN is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2008	0.54

The correlation between XME and TAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

XME vs. TAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XME	TAN
Basic Materials	76.3%	-
Energy	22.5%	57.3%
Technology	2.2%	65.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Industrials	0.4%	2.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	29.2%

Return for Risk

XME vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 54
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 50
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 46

TAN

TAN Risk / Return Rank: 68
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XME	TAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.16	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.81	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.97	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.40	12.49	-5.09

XME vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the TAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and TAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XME vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and TAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	TAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-95.29%	+9.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.60%	-20.94%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-64.40%	+33.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-73.95%	+36.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	-78.53%	+16.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.45%	-73.11%	+56.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.05%	-78.47%	+34.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.24%	6.64%	+2.60%

Volatility

XME vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 14.26%, while Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	TAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.26%	16.60%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.34%	28.78%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.35%	38.50%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.76%	40.14%	-7.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.91%	38.16%	-5.25%

XME vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

XME vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.30%	0.69%	1.77%	5.04%	1.60%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XME and TAN in my portfolio?

XME and TAN have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XME or TAN?

TAN has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to XME (14.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs TAN's -95.29%.

Which ETF is better, XME or TAN?

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 18.52% vs 12.35% for TAN. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 14.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XME or TAN?

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XME or TAN?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XME or TAN?

XME has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for TAN.

What is the main difference between XME and TAN?

XME is categorized as Materials, while TAN is Alternative Energy Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while TAN tracks MAC Global Solar Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.69% for TAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.