TAN vs. CNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG).
TAN and CNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 15, 2008. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both TAN and CNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TAN or CNRG.
Key characteristics
| TAN | CNRG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -34.70% | -14.85% |
| 1Y Return | -24.24% | -4.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -29.59% | -17.60% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.70% | 10.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.39 | 0.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.33 | 0.35 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.96 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.19 | 0.04 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.78 | 0.18 |
| Ulcer Index | 20.97% | 13.16% |
| Daily Std Dev | 41.66% | 32.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.29% | -59.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -84.08% | -56.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and CNRG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TAN vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a -34.70% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's -14.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAN vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TAN vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TAN vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
TAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than CNRG's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.70% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.28% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.75% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than CNRG's maximum drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TAN vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 15.62% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 10.49%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.