PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. SGDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's -4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed SGDM with an annualized return of 19.60%, while SGDM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.


XME

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
16.32%
6M
18.13%
1Y
85.07%
3Y*
35.23%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
19.60%

SGDM

1D
3.49%
1M
-14.98%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
43.72%
3Y*
37.20%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.32%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
-4.58%153.46%12.14%2.34%-8.23%-9.15%21.85%44.27%-15.14%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and SGDM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.46

The correlation between XME and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (10 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XME vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
SGDM

Basic Materials

74.9%
100.0%

Energy

23.8%

-

Technology

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XME
74.9%
SGDM
100.0%

Energy

XME
23.8%
SGDM

-

Technology

XME
2.2%
SGDM

-

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.8%
SGDM

-

Industrials

XME
0.4%
SGDM

-

Communication Services

XME

-

SGDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

SGDM

-

Financial Services

XME

-

SGDM

-

Healthcare

XME

-

SGDM

-

Real Estate

XME

-

SGDM

-

Utilities

XME

-

SGDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDM
SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMESGDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.30

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

3.60

+5.98

XME vs. SGDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the SGDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and SGDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XME vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and SGDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMESGDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-54.95%

-30.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-35.96%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-35.96%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-45.06%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-49.69%

-12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-30.31%

+20.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.09%

-25.46%

-18.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

12.93%

-3.88%

Volatility

XME vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 15.26%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMESGDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.26%

16.53%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.51%

38.64%

-10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.11%

46.24%

-10.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

36.11%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.96%

36.97%

-4.01%

XME vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SGDM's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.09%1.04%1.04%1.39%1.42%1.33%0.30%0.25%0.50%0.58%0.02%1.47%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and SGDM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to XME (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs SGDM's -54.95%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 11.84% for SGDM. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 15.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.

SGDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

XME is categorized as Materials, while SGDM is Gold. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.50% for SGDM.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and SGDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer