XME vs. SGDM
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while SGDM is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 19.60%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for SGDM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.
Performance
XME vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's -4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed SGDM with an annualized return of 19.60%, while SGDM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 85.07%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
SGDM
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
XME vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -4.58% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and SGDM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.46 |
The correlation between XME and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (10 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XME vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
SGDM
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XME
SGDM
Energy
XME
SGDM
-
Technology
XME
SGDM
-
Consumer Defensive
XME
SGDM
-
Industrials
XME
SGDM
-
Communication Services
XME
-
SGDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
SGDM
-
Financial Services
XME
-
SGDM
-
Healthcare
XME
-
SGDM
-
Real Estate
XME
-
SGDM
-
Utilities
XME
-
SGDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
XME
SGDM
XME vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 1.30 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 3.60 | +5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -54.95% | -30.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -35.96% | +13.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -35.96% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -45.06% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -49.69% | -12.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.33% | -30.31% | +20.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.09% | -25.46% | -18.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.05% | 12.93% | -3.88% |
Volatility
XME vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 15.26%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 16.53% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.51% | 38.64% | -10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 46.24% | -10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 36.11% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.96% | 36.97% | -4.01% |
XME vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SGDM's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and SGDM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to XME (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 11.84% for SGDM. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 15.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.
SGDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while SGDM is Gold. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.50% for SGDM.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer