XME vs. LVHI
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XME returned 21.45%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
XME vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 11.45% return.
XME
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- 84.92%
- 3Y*
- 35.78%
- 5Y*
- 21.45%
- 10Y*
- 19.09%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
XME vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 14.53% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and LVHI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between XME and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XME vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
LVHI
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XME
LVHI
Energy
XME
LVHI
Technology
XME
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
XME
LVHI
Industrials
XME
LVHI
Communication Services
XME
-
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
LVHI
Financial Services
XME
-
LVHI
Healthcare
XME
-
LVHI
Real Estate
XME
-
LVHI
Utilities
XME
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
XME
LVHI
XME vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XME | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.58 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 4.84 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 19.99 | -10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XME | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 3.10 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.42 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.81 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
XME vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -32.31% | -53.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -6.08% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -11.99% | -18.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -11.99% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.72% | -1.79% | -8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.12% | -3.52% | -40.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.92% | 1.47% | +7.45% |
Volatility
XME vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.01% | 2.35% | +11.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.83% | 7.58% | +20.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.60% | 9.50% | +26.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.72% | 11.07% | +21.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 13.76% | +19.15% |
XME vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and LVHI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, XME leads with 21.45% vs 15.67% for LVHI. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XME has performed better with a 21.45% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer