PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 11.45% return.


XME

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
14.53%
6M
20.99%
1Y
84.92%
3Y*
35.78%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
19.09%

LVHI

1D
0.37%
1M
0.77%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
14.53%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.45%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and LVHI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.43

The correlation between XME and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XME vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
LVHI

Basic Materials

75.3%
6.1%

Energy

23.4%
17.4%

Technology

2.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
8.7%

Industrials

0.4%
13.4%

Communication Services

-

5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Financial Services

-

23.6%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

10.4%

Basic Materials

XME
75.3%
LVHI
6.1%

Energy

XME
23.4%
LVHI
17.4%

Technology

XME
2.2%
LVHI
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.8%
LVHI
8.7%

Industrials

XME
0.4%
LVHI
13.4%

Communication Services

XME

-

LVHI
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

LVHI
5.3%

Financial Services

XME

-

LVHI
23.6%

Healthcare

XME

-

LVHI
7.4%

Real Estate

XME

-

LVHI
1.9%

Utilities

XME

-

LVHI
10.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMELVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.58

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

4.84

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

19.99

-10.43

XME vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMELVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.10

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.42

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.81

-0.65

Drawdowns

XME vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMELVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-32.31%

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-6.08%

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-11.99%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-11.99%

-25.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-1.79%

-8.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.12%

-3.52%

-40.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

1.47%

+7.45%

Volatility

XME vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMELVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

2.35%

+11.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.83%

7.58%

+20.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.60%

9.50%

+26.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.72%

11.07%

+21.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.91%

13.76%

+19.15%

XME vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and LVHI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, XME leads with 21.45% vs 15.67% for LVHI. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XME has performed better with a 21.45% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

XME is categorized as Materials, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer