PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.50% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 19.14%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.


XME

1D
0.16%
1M
4.36%
YTD
16.50%
6M
19.83%
1Y
85.37%
3Y*
35.28%
5Y*
22.93%
10Y*
19.14%

ARKQ

1D
4.08%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.47%
6M
19.36%
1Y
64.14%
3Y*
34.41%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
22.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.50%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
17.47%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and ARKQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.55

The correlation between XME and ARKQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XME vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
ARKQ

Basic Materials

74.9%

-

Energy

23.8%
1.7%

Technology

2.2%
34.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.4%
39.0%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.8%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Basic Materials

XME
74.9%
ARKQ

-

Energy

XME
23.8%
ARKQ
1.7%

Technology

XME
2.2%
ARKQ
34.2%

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.8%
ARKQ

-

Industrials

XME
0.4%
ARKQ
39.0%

Communication Services

XME

-

ARKQ
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

ARKQ
13.8%

Financial Services

XME

-

ARKQ

-

Healthcare

XME

-

ARKQ
1.1%

Real Estate

XME

-

ARKQ

-

Utilities

XME

-

ARKQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMEARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.13

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

9.22

+0.23

XME vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XME vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-59.89%

-26.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-20.58%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-30.76%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-55.71%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-59.89%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.18%

-6.35%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-17.21%

-26.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

6.98%

+2.09%

Volatility

XME vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 13.37%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

13.37%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.15%

26.41%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.17%

33.76%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.83%

32.56%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.93%

30.01%

+2.92%

XME vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than ARKQ's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 19.14% for XME. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

XME has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.

XME is categorized as Materials, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.75% for ARKQ.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer