XLY vs. VHT
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.78%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VHT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
XLY vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 12.78%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
XLY vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and VHT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLY and VHT has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLY vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
VHT
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
VHT
-
Communication Services
XLY
VHT
-
Technology
XLY
VHT
Industrials
XLY
VHT
Basic Materials
XLY
-
VHT
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
VHT
-
Energy
XLY
-
VHT
-
Financial Services
XLY
-
VHT
Healthcare
XLY
-
VHT
Real Estate
XLY
-
VHT
-
Utilities
XLY
-
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
VHT
XLY vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLY | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.53 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 3.81 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLY vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -39.12% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -10.40% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -16.91% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -17.71% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | -28.85% | -10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -3.28% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -5.99% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 4.19% | +0.69% |
Volatility
XLY vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.88%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 4.88% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 10.46% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 14.70% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 15.01% | +8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 16.97% | +5.11% |
XLY vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLY vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and VHT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.78% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.09% for VHT.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer