XLY vs. IXC
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.78%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for IXC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
XLY vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 12.78%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
XLY vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and IXC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.45 |
The correlation between XLY and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLY vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
IXC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
IXC
-
Communication Services
XLY
IXC
-
Technology
XLY
IXC
-
Industrials
XLY
IXC
-
Basic Materials
XLY
-
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
IXC
-
Energy
XLY
-
IXC
Financial Services
XLY
-
IXC
-
Healthcare
XLY
-
IXC
-
Real Estate
XLY
-
IXC
-
Utilities
XLY
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
IXC
XLY vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.34 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 4.05 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 11.55 | -9.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLY vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -67.88% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -9.66% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -19.06% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -24.93% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | -64.16% | +24.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -7.04% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -17.47% | +7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 3.38% | +1.50% |
Volatility
XLY vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) have volatilities of 6.19% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 6.44% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 15.63% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 18.79% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 23.53% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 26.84% | -4.76% |
XLY vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLY vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than IXC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and IXC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to XLY (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.78% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer