PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 12.57%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.


XLY

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
12.57%

BND

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.17%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.07%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and BND is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

-0.10

The correlation between XLY and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.83

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

5.43

-3.42

XLY vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.32

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

-0.01

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.28

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.58

-0.16

Drawdowns

XLY vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-18.58%

-40.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-2.68%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-5.92%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-17.91%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-18.58%

-21.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-2.70%

-4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-3.06%

-6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

0.90%

+3.90%

Volatility

XLY vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.20%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

1.20%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

2.69%

+10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

3.72%

+14.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

6.02%

+17.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

5.53%

+16.53%

XLY vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLY vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than BND's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.98%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and BND have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.57% vs 1.53% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.03% for BND.

BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer