XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and DRDR.L (iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, from Invesco and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLVP.L returned 6.90%/yr vs -0.91%/yr for DRDR.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLVP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DRDR.L.

Performance

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than DRDR.L's 1.01% return.

XLVP.L

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 3.80%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

DRDR.L

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: -0.48%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: 3.43%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF	-1.84%	6.91%	3.77%	-3.87%	8.97%	29.14%	8.22%	16.79%	10.30%	11.00%
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	1.01%	10.25%	2.62%	-2.51%	-14.93%	-5.21%	48.69%	8.88%	2.12%	23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XLVP.L and DRDR.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016	0.69

The correlation between XLVP.L and DRDR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLVP.L	DRDR.L
Healthcare	100.0%	98.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLVP.L

XLVP.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XLVP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLVP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

DRDR.L

DRDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
DRDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
DRDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
DRDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
DRDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DRDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLVP.L	DRDR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.39	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.07	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.73	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	4.35	-0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the DRDR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLVP.L and DRDR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLVP.L	DRDR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.39	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	-0.05	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.34	+0.36

Drawdowns

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, smaller than the maximum DRDR.L drawdown of -38.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and DRDR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLVP.L	DRDR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-38.49%	+18.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-12.51%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.67%	-22.38%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.67%	-35.81%	+16.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-16.88%	+11.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-15.17%	+10.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	4.98%	-0.41%

Volatility

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) at 4.79%. This indicates that XLVP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLVP.L	DRDR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	4.79%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	11.52%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.76%	15.56%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	17.52%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	18.58%	-2.73%

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DRDR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLVP.L vs. DRDR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLVP.L nor DRDR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLVP.L and DRDR.L in my portfolio?

XLVP.L and DRDR.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLVP.L or DRDR.L?

On fees, XLVP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLVP.L or DRDR.L?

XLVP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DRDR.L.

What is the main difference between XLVP.L and DRDR.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLVP.L and 0.40% for DRDR.L.