XLVP.L vs. VHT
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT).
XLVP.L and VHT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLVP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. VHT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both XLVP.L and VHT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLVP.L or VHT.
Key characteristics
| XLVP.L | VHT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.69% | 14.38% |
| 1Y Return | 12.58% | 19.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.27% | 4.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.31% | 12.07% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.84% | 10.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.11 | 1.76 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.44% | 11.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.58% | -39.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.15% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVP.L and VHT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XLVP.L vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's 14.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 12.84%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLVP.L vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLVP.L vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLVP.L vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
XLVP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.25% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% | 1.02% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
XLVP.L vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum VHT drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and VHT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLVP.L vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 2.37%. This indicates that XLVP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.