XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS).
XLVP.L and WHEA.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLVP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. WHEA.AS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both XLVP.L and WHEA.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLVP.L or WHEA.AS.
Key characteristics
| XLVP.L | WHEA.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.62% | 15.69% |
| 1Y Return | 12.58% | 14.51% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.60% | 7.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.78% | 11.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.24 | 1.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.41% | 10.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.58% | -25.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.32% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVP.L and WHEA.AS is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than WHEA.AS's 15.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than WHEA.AS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLVP.L nor WHEA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum WHEA.AS drawdown of -25.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and WHEA.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLVP.L vs. WHEA.AS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) at 2.61%. This indicates that XLVP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHEA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.