PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 16.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed RDIV with an annualized return of 9.81%, while RDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return.


XLV

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.90%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
9.81%

RDIV

1D
1.52%
1M
6.52%
YTD
16.75%
6M
14.41%
1Y
32.09%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.23%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
16.75%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and RDIV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.51

The correlation between XLV and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
RDIV

Healthcare

100.0%
6.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Communication Services

-

8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.6%

Energy

-

17.3%

Financial Services

-

17.8%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

7.3%

Technology

-

6.2%

Utilities

-

6.2%

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
RDIV
6.8%

Basic Materials

XLV

-

RDIV
0.5%

Communication Services

XLV

-

RDIV
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

RDIV
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

RDIV
14.6%

Energy

XLV

-

RDIV
17.3%

Financial Services

XLV

-

RDIV
17.8%

Industrials

XLV

-

RDIV

-

Real Estate

XLV

-

RDIV
7.3%

Technology

XLV

-

RDIV
6.2%

Utilities

XLV

-

RDIV
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLVRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

6.30

-4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

18.74

-15.43

XLV vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-49.97%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-4.84%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-17.91%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-24.89%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-49.97%

+21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

0.00%

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-5.85%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

1.64%

+2.73%

Volatility

XLV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 3.52%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.52%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

8.64%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

13.19%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

17.55%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

21.88%

-5.30%

XLV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than RDIV's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.51%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.63%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to RDIV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.39% vs 9.81% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.63% for XLV.

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer