XLV vs. PAVE
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLV returned 6.00%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for PAVE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
XLV vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.86% return.
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
XLV vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 11.96% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLV and PAVE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.53 |
The correlation between XLV and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLV vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLV
PAVE
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XLV
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
XLV
-
PAVE
Communication Services
XLV
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLV
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
XLV
-
PAVE
Energy
XLV
-
PAVE
Financial Services
XLV
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
XLV
-
PAVE
Real Estate
XLV
-
PAVE
-
Technology
XLV
-
PAVE
Utilities
XLV
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
PAVE
XLV vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLV | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.11 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 11.32 | -8.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLV vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -44.08% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -11.91% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -26.23% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -26.23% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -1.01% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -6.23% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 3.27% | +1.10% |
Volatility
XLV vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 4.90%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 7.35% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 15.87% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 19.49% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 21.70% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 24.40% | -7.82% |
XLV vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLV vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLV and PAVE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.84% vs 6.00% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLV and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer