PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLUI vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLUI vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUI achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.04% return.


XLUI

1D
1.50%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
5.18%
6M
3.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAVE

1D
1.63%
1M
0.35%
YTD
19.04%
6M
19.47%
1Y
38.20%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLUI vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLUI and PAVE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.40

XLUI vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLUI
PAVE

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

20.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

74.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Financial Services

XLUI
100.0%
PAVE

-

Basic Materials

XLUI

-

PAVE
20.3%

Communication Services

XLUI

-

PAVE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLUI

-

PAVE

-

Consumer Defensive

XLUI

-

PAVE
0.3%

Energy

XLUI

-

PAVE
0.2%

Healthcare

XLUI

-

PAVE

-

Industrials

XLUI

-

PAVE
74.8%

Real Estate

XLUI

-

PAVE

-

Technology

XLUI

-

PAVE
1.1%

Utilities

XLUI

-

PAVE
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLUI vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUI

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUI vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLUI vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUIPAVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.68

-0.06

Drawdowns

XLUI vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUI drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUI and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUIPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-44.08%

+38.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-2.50%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-6.24%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

Volatility

XLUI vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUIPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

18.84%

-7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.14%

21.60%

-10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.14%

24.39%

-13.25%

XLUI vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLUI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLUI vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

XLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.77%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%
XLUI
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
12.78%7.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLUI and PAVE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLUI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.

XLUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.78%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLUI and 0.47% for PAVE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLUI and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer