XLUI vs. MSTZ
XLUI (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUI is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. XLUI charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUI achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.
XLUI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 5.07%
- 1M
- 46.38%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -23.27%
- 1Y
- 282.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.69% | 0.27% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -23.27% | 321.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUI and MSTZ is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUI vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTZ
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLUI | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUI drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUI and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUI | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -99.38% | +93.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -97.39% | +97.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -94.53% | +92.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.51% | — |
Volatility
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUI | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 56.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 135.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 148.53% | -137.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 171.02% | -159.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 171.02% | -159.85% |
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLUI vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
XLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.68%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.68% | 7.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUI and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
XLUI has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
XLUI is categorized as Utilities Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLUI and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for XLUI and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer