XLU vs. XRT
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for XRT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
XLU vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than XRT's 3.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLU having a 9.20% annualized return and XRT not far ahead at 9.52%.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
XRT
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
XLU vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 3.14% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and XRT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.32 |
The correlation between XLU and XRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLU vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
XRT
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
XRT
-
Basic Materials
XLU
-
XRT
-
Communication Services
XLU
-
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
XRT
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
XRT
Energy
XLU
-
XRT
Financial Services
XLU
-
XRT
-
Healthcare
XLU
-
XRT
Industrials
XLU
-
XRT
-
Real Estate
XLU
-
XRT
-
Technology
XLU
-
XRT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
XRT
XLU vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 2.48 | +0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -65.81% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -13.53% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -25.62% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -44.57% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -47.02% | +10.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -9.32% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -14.99% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 5.92% | -1.67% |
Volatility
XLU vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.73% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 13.90% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 20.59% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 26.91% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 27.17% | -7.90% |
XLU vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLU vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than XRT's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.79% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and XRT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to XLU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 10-year performance, XRT leads with 9.52% vs 9.20% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XRT has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.79% for XRT.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XRT is Consumer Discretionary Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.35% for XRT.
XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer