PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. XNKY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLU is traded in USD, while XNKY.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XNKY.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 30.80% return.


XLU

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.48%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.20%

XNKY.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.14%
YTD
30.80%
6M
32.37%
1Y
60.28%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.04%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%1.36%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
30.80%31.13%7.80%21.76%-20.02%-4.98%19.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and XNKY.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2020

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUXNKY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

4.10

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

13.45

-10.65

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and XNKY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than XNKY.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XNKY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUXNKY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-35.76%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-15.19%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-18.89%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-33.88%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-1.33%

-4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-12.30%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

4.64%

-0.39%

Volatility

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.59%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUXNKY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

6.98%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

19.80%

-8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

25.01%

-10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

20.03%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

19.90%

-0.63%

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.67%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XNKY.DE is Japan Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and XNKY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer