PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 9.19%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.


XLU

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
3.55%
6M
1.36%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
9.19%

SPYM

1D
0.12%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.72%
6M
12.10%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.55%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.72%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and SPYM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and SPYM has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLU vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
SPYM

Utilities

100.0%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
SPYM
2.5%

Basic Materials

XLU

-

SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

XLU

-

SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

SPYM
4.6%

Energy

XLU

-

SPYM
3.2%

Financial Services

XLU

-

SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

XLU

-

SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

XLU

-

SPYM
7.6%

Real Estate

XLU

-

SPYM
1.8%

Technology

XLU

-

SPYM
38.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUSPYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.54

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

3.44

-2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.42

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.52

15.95

-13.43

XLU vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.54

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.85

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.88

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.62

-0.22

Drawdowns

XLU vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-54.46%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-8.90%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-18.72%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-24.48%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-33.87%

-2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

0.00%

-7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-7.15%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

1.91%

+2.16%

Volatility

XLU vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.74%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

2.74%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

8.89%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

11.78%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.80%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.01%

+1.25%

XLU vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than SPYM's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
0.99%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.71%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and SPYM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPYM (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.70% vs 9.19% for XLU. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.99% for SPYM.

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer