XLU vs. SPYM
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.19%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPYM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XLU vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 9.19%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
XLU vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.55% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 11.72% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and SPYM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and SPYM has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLU vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
SPYM
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
SPYM
Basic Materials
XLU
-
SPYM
Communication Services
XLU
-
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
SPYM
Energy
XLU
-
SPYM
Financial Services
XLU
-
SPYM
Healthcare
XLU
-
SPYM
Industrials
XLU
-
SPYM
Real Estate
XLU
-
SPYM
Technology
XLU
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
SPYM
XLU vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 2.54 | -1.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 3.44 | -2.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.42 | -2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 15.95 | -13.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.54 | -1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.85 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.88 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.62 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
XLU vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -54.46% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -8.90% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -18.72% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -24.48% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -33.87% | -2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | 0.00% | -7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -7.15% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 1.91% | +2.16% |
Volatility
XLU vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.74%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 2.74% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 8.89% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 11.78% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 16.80% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 18.01% | +1.25% |
XLU vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLU vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than SPYM's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.71% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and SPYM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPYM (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.70% vs 9.19% for XLU. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.99% for SPYM.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer