XLSI vs. GLDM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. XLSI is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past year, XLSI returned 6.59% vs 20.58% for GLDM. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

XLSI vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -6.13% return.

XLSI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.55%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.53%

GLDM

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: -16.53%
• YTD: -6.13%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: 27.59%
• 5Y*: 17.31%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	$263.44M	$251.25M	$317.77M
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$285.83K	$265.98K	$245.15K

XLSI vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	6.67%	-1.06%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-6.13%	29.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and GLDM is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

XLSI vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLSI

XLSI Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XLSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XLSI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XLSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
XLSI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 31
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLSI vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLSI	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.83	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	1.19	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.17	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	0.88	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.87	1.90	-0.04

XLSI vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSI and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLSI	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-26.27%	+18.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-26.27%	+18.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-24.94%	+23.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-6.56%	+3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	12.12%	-8.30%

Volatility

XLSI vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) is 4.23%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that XLSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLSI	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	6.35%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	23.37%	-14.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	27.92%	-16.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	18.39%	-7.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	17.10%	-5.93%

XLSI vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLSI vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.89%	5.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLSI and GLDM in my portfolio?

XLSI and GLDM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLSI or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to XLSI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSI dropped -7.87% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

Which ETF is better, XLSI or GLDM?

On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 20.58% vs 6.59% for XLSI. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, XLSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLSI or GLDM?

Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLSI or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLSI or GLDM?

XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between XLSI and GLDM?

XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLDM is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.