XLSI vs. GLDM
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. XLSI is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
XLSI vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -7.26% return.
XLSI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -12.90%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XLSI vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.26% | -1.06% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -7.26% | 29.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and GLDM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
XLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLDM
XLSI vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLSI | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -26.11% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -25.85% | +23.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -6.43% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.63% | — |
Volatility
XLSI vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 27.76% | -16.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 18.30% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 17.07% | -6.00% |
XLSI vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.94% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and GLDM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLSI.
XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 11.94%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLDM is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.10% for GLDM.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer