PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. AVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. AVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than AVL's -1.66% return.


XLSI

1D
1.70%
1M
0.48%
6M
2.36%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVL

1D
-9.70%
1M
-3.36%
6M
1.26%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
30.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. AVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and AVL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.29

XLSI vs. AVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLSI
AVL

Financial Services

98.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLSI
98.9%
AVL

-

Basic Materials

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Communication Services

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Consumer Defensive

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Energy

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Healthcare

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Industrials

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Real Estate

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Technology

XLSI

-

AVL
100.0%

Utilities

XLSI

-

AVL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. AVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AVL
AVL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSI vs. AVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLSIAVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

XLSI vs. AVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. AVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum AVL drawdown of -70.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and AVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIAVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-70.63%

+62.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-43.41%

+41.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-24.43%

+21.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.39%

Volatility

XLSI vs. AVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIAVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

94.39%

-83.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.21%

107.22%

-96.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

107.22%

-96.01%

XLSI vs. AVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AVL's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. AVL - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.91%, less than AVL's 30.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
30.18%29.04%0.22%
XLSI
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.91%5.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and AVL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.

AVL has the higher dividend yield at 30.18%, compared with 11.91% for XLSI.

XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while AVL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 1.04% for AVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and AVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer