XLSI vs. AIVC
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. XLSI is actively managed, while AIVC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AIVC.
Performance
XLSI vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 79.45% return.
XLSI
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIVC
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 30.74%
- YTD
- 79.45%
- 6M
- 79.35%
- 1Y
- 151.70%
- 3Y*
- 51.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
XLSI vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 1.78% | -0.33% |
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 79.45% | 19.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and AIVC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.19 |
XLSI vs. AIVC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLSI
AIVC
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLSI
AIVC
Basic Materials
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Communication Services
XLSI
-
AIVC
Consumer Cyclical
XLSI
-
AIVC
Consumer Defensive
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Energy
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Healthcare
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Industrials
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Real Estate
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Technology
XLSI
-
AIVC
Utilities
XLSI
-
AIVC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank
XLSI
AIVC
XLSI vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLSI | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.64 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and AIVC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -56.11% | +48.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -1.33% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -16.43% | +13.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility
XLSI vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 29.71% | -19.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 30.20% | -19.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 26.93% | -16.49% |
XLSI vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, more than AIVC's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 0.92% | 0.64% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.76% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and AIVC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.
XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 10.76%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.
XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIVC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.59% for AIVC.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and AIVC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer