PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. AIBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. AIBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than AIBU's 45.72% return.


XLSI

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIBU

1D
-1.58%
1M
24.46%
YTD
45.72%
6M
34.76%
1Y
104.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. AIBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and AIBU is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.23

XLSI vs. AIBU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLSI
AIBU

Financial Services

100.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

26.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLSI
100.1%
AIBU

-

Basic Materials

XLSI

-

AIBU

-

Communication Services

XLSI

-

AIBU
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLSI

-

AIBU
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLSI

-

AIBU

-

Energy

XLSI

-

AIBU

-

Healthcare

XLSI

-

AIBU
0.2%

Industrials

XLSI

-

AIBU
0.1%

Real Estate

XLSI

-

AIBU

-

Technology

XLSI

-

AIBU
26.0%

Utilities

XLSI

-

AIBU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. AIBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSI

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSI vs. AIBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLSI vs. AIBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLSIAIBUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.22

-1.08

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. AIBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum AIBU drawdown of -51.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and AIBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIAIBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-51.17%

+43.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.58%

-5.86%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-13.74%

+10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.92%

Volatility

XLSI vs. AIBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIAIBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

47.71%

-37.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.42%

55.33%

-44.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.42%

55.33%

-44.91%

XLSI vs. AIBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIBU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. AIBU - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than AIBU's 1.54% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and AIBU have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 10.78%, compared with 1.54% for AIBU.

XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIBU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.96% for AIBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and AIBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer