PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 55.50% return.


XLSI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.55%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.53%

CHPY

1D
0.27%
1M
-11.10%
6M
39.35%
YTD
55.50%
1Y
93.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
95.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.10M$56.24M$62.00M
$285.83K$265.98K$245.15K

XLSI vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and CHPY is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLSI
XLSI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLSI vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLSICHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.39

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

3.33

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

15.63

-13.77

XLSI vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSI and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum CHPY drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSICHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-27.64%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-27.64%

+19.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-20.81%

+18.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.03%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

5.88%

-2.06%

Volatility

XLSI vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) is 4.23%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that XLSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSICHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

17.69%

-13.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

34.00%

-25.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

38.28%

-27.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.17%

39.15%

-27.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.17%

39.15%

-27.98%

XLSI vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, less than CHPY's 38.69% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and CHPY have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to XLSI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSI dropped -7.87% vs CHPY's -27.64%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 93.51% vs 6.59% for XLSI. On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 93.51% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 38.69%, compared with 11.89% for XLSI.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer