PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 96.36% return.


XLSI

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
2.11%
1M
19.19%
YTD
96.36%
6M
96.20%
1Y
154.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and CHPY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSI vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLSICHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.23

XLSI vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum CHPY drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSICHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-12.19%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

0.00%

-5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-2.12%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

XLSI vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSICHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

31.79%

-21.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.70%

35.81%

-25.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

35.81%

-25.11%

XLSI vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, less than CHPY's 27.58% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and CHPY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 27.58%, compared with 10.61% for XLSI.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.99% for CHPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer