XLSI vs. ACYS
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
XLSI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XLSI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLSI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and ACYS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -0.63% | -7.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -0.24% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -0.14% | -3.10% |
Volatility
XLSI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 3.45% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 3.45% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 3.45% | +7.62% |
XLSI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.94% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and ACYS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 11.94%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer