PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. ACYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XLSI

1D
0.61%
1M
0.18%
6M
3.33%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACYS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.70%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and ACYS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLSI vs. ACYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and ACYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIACYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-0.63%

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-0.24%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-0.14%

-3.10%

Volatility

XLSI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIACYSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

3.45%

+7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.07%

3.45%

+7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

3.45%

+7.62%

XLSI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and ACYS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.

XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 11.94%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.75% for ACYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and ACYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer