XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L
XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) and WCOS.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L returned 8.36%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for WCOS.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLPP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WCOS.L.
Performance
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLPP.L is traded in GBp, while WCOS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WCOS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than WCOS.L's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has outperformed WCOS.L with an annualized return of 8.36%, while WCOS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return.
XLPP.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
WCOS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 6.46% | -2.88% | 15.99% | -5.68% | 11.45% | 19.81% | 5.47% | 22.94% | -4.14% | 2.23% |
WCOS.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF | 4.24% | 0.79% | 7.79% | -3.15% | 5.99% | 13.88% | 4.44% | 17.81% | -4.86% | 7.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLPP.L and WCOS.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XLPP.L and WCOS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLPP.L
WCOS.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLPP.L
WCOS.L
Technology
XLPP.L
WCOS.L
-
Industrials
XLPP.L
WCOS.L
-
Basic Materials
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
-
Communication Services
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
Energy
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
-
Financial Services
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
-
Healthcare
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
Real Estate
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
-
Utilities
XLPP.L
-
WCOS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLPP.L
WCOS.L
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLPP.L | WCOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.04 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 0.23 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 0.54 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLPP.L | WCOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.17 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.42 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.47 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.49 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, which is greater than WCOS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and WCOS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLPP.L | WCOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.86% | -17.00% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.39% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -9.39% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -11.15% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.86% | -17.00% | -1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -8.39% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -4.10% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.05% | -0.17% |
Volatility
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) at 5.04%. This indicates that XLPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCOS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLPP.L | WCOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 5.04% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 10.84% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 12.92% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 12.08% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 13.47% | +0.96% |
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than WCOS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLPP.L vs. WCOS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLPP.L nor WCOS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLPP.L and WCOS.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLPP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOS.L.
Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPP.L and 0.30% for WCOS.L.
Find the right allocation for XLPP.L and WCOS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer